By Sallieu S. Kanu
The Ombudsman, Tejan Ahmed Israel Jah Esq., has refuted a series of allegations directed at him, describing them as baseless and an attempt to smear his hard-earned reputation. He emphasized that he has never tried to gain direct access to government funds allocated to his office.
Financial Impropriety
Upon taking office over a year ago, Israel Jah Esq. observed significant financial impropriety within the office, which negatively impacted its proper functioning. He noted instances where senior officials withdrew money from the office account without his knowledge and expended it without proper documentation, including invoices. He stressed that suchmishaps, if allowed to continue, would hamper the operations of the institution.
Ensuring Accountability
Israel Jah Esq. stated that his actions are aimed at ensuring that funds are not withdrawn from the office account without his consent, to maintain proper accountability and financial prudence. He clarified that there was no time when he prioritized personal and non-essential expenses over the needs of the office.
Refuting Specific Allegations
The Ombudsman refuted claims that he requested an increase in monthly fuel allocation, stating, “How can I do such when there is a standard in the public service on the allocation of fuel?” He also denied requesting a salary increment, explaining that he could not determine his salary.
Resistance to Reforms
Israel Jah Esq. attributed the unfounded allegations to individuals resistant to following the law on financial management and procurement. He believes that some personnel are fighting back to deter him from pursuing reforms in the institution. Despite these challenges, he remains determined to pursue what is right and in the nation’s interest.
Historical Challenges
The challenges faced by Israel Jah Esq. are similar to those encountered by previous holders of the office. The Office of the Ombudsman in Sierra Leone was established by Section 146 of the 1991 Constitution to investigate complaints from the public who claim to have suffered injustice due to maladministration by government ministries, departments, agencies, statutory corporations, or institutions established with public funds.